Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: Prospective data on patient-reported financial toxicity (FT) during radiation therapy for spine metastases are limited. This secondary analysis of the SPORTSMEN trial (NCT05617716) characterized FT and quality of life, including changes 3 months after treatment. METHODS: SPORTSMEN is a phase II trial randomizing patients with symptomatic spine metastases to SBRT (24 Gy/2 fractions or 19 Gy/1 fraction) or conventional EBRT (8 Gy/1 fraction). FT was measured with the COST-FACIT (lower scores indicate greater FT) and graded 0 (none) to 3 (severe); item 12 assessed familial hardship. Quality of life was measured with the EQ-5D-5L (higher scores indicate worse function) and EQ Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Analyses used Spearman correlation and the exact Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Of 18 enrolled patients since 2025, 15 completed baseline COST-FACIT and 17 completed EQ-5D-5L. Eight (53%) had grade 1 to 2 FT. All patients with FT reported familial financial hardship, which correlated with FT grade (ρ=0.67, P=0.007). Pain was the most impaired domain (mean: 3.9, 71% severe or extreme). Among 7 patients with 3-month data, pain decreased from 4.3 to 2.3 (P=0.0625), EQ VAS rose from 44 to 64 (P=0.34), and FT increased from 2/7 patients to 5/7 patients. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of patients had FT before radiation therapy, closely tied to familial hardship. Although pain and self-rated health improved after treatment, FT did not. Financial screening and support for patients and families should begin at diagnosis and continue after treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stump et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: