Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article examines the criminal law aspects of implementing the principle of personal culpability in the context of the expanding use of artificial intelligence technologies. Drawing upon a comprehensive analysis of scholarly literature, current legislation, and contemporary doctrinal approaches, the study explores the legal nature of artificial intelligence, identifies the limits of its significance for criminal law, and assesses the possibility of its involvement in the mechanism of criminal conduct. It is argued that contemporary intelligent systems do not possess the characteristics required to qualify as subjects of crime, as they lack consciousness, free will, and the capacity to form a culpable mental attitude toward the committed act.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Порайко Василий Вячеславович (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: