Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Big Bang nucleosynthesis is the earliest quantitative success in cosmology: one measured number, the baryon-to-photon ratio, fed into a network of nuclear reactions, predicts the primordial abundances of the light elements — and for deuterium and helium-4 the predictions land on the observations. For lithium-7 they do not. The predicted primordial abundance is (4.94 ± 0.72) × 10⁻¹⁰ lithium atoms per hydrogen atom (a second standard compilation reads (5.1 ⁺⁰·⁷₋₀·₆) × 10⁻¹⁰). The oldest stars in the Galaxy, whose atmospheres should preserve the primordial value nearly untouched, read (1.6 ± 0.3) × 10⁻¹⁰ (second compilation: (1.7 ± 0.06 ± 0.44) × 10⁻¹⁰). The theory's table and the sky's table differ by a factor of 3.1 — 4.3 sigma in either compilation — and the discrepancy has survived four decades of scrutiny of every line in both budgets. This paper prices the defect: why the prediction is not a fit (its single input is measured independently by the cosmic microwave background), why the observation is not a scatter plot (the Spite plateau is flat, which is itself a constraint), and what each of the three doors out costs — including the finding that the cheapest door, a wrong nuclear rate, has been measured shut: the key destruction rate would have to be underestimated by a factor of two and a half, and the record now excludes that. Grade: DEFECT STANDS — PRICED, UNRESOLVED. This paper stands outside my work on the vacuum catastrophe; it draws nothing from that work and repairs nothing in it, and it touches no claim of that program.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: