Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: Accurate assessment of low levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression has become increasingly important with the expansion of HER2-targeted therapies to patients with HER2-low and HER2-ultralow breast cancer (BC). Following the introduction of revised College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines incorporating the HER2-ultralow (0+) category, we conducted a nationwide multireader study to evaluate interobserver variation in HER2 interpretation and to investigate the impact of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted image analysis. Materials and Methods: A total of 168 BC cases stained using the VENTANA HER2 (4B5) assay were digitized as whole-slide images (WSIs). Thirty-four board-certified breast pathologists independently reviewed all cases without AI assistance and repeated the assessment after a four-week washout period using AI support. Interobserver agreement, classification performance, and reading time were compared between the two phases. Results: AI assistance significantly improved interobserver agreement (Krippendorff's alpha, 0.7415 to 0.8849; Fleiss' kappa, 0.4492 to 0.7524; p<0.001). The largest gains in diagnostic performance were observed in HER2-ultralow and HER2 IHC 1+ BCs, with sensitivities improving from 48.5% to 73.9% and from 64.9% to 87.7%, respectively (p<0.001). Although overall reading time was not reduced in the unadjusted analysis, AI assistance shortened interpretation time in HER2-ultralow BCs by 3.12 seconds (5.1% reduction). Conclusion: AI-assisted assessment improved the reproducibility and diagnostic performance of HER2 interpretation, with the greatest benefit observed in clinically relevant HER2 low-expression categories. The reduced interpretation time in HER2-ultralow BCs further suggests that AI can improve efficiency in diagnostically challenging cases encountered in routine practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: