Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Pallet-label identification underpins warehouse inventory accuracy, but how imaging geometry affects optical character recognition (OCR) of robot-captured labels has not been characterized. This study evaluates a robotic OCR pipeline with database validation. Methods: An Ava Telepresence Robot captured label images, which the Google Cloud Vision API read and a simulated warehouse management system validated. A full-factorial experiment varied font size (12–16 pt), distance (1.00–1.50 m), and horizontal angle (0–60°) across 108 images; 120 validation reads assessed identifier accuracy. Results: In a conservative analysis, all three main effects on OCR confidence were significant (p ≤ 0.006). Confidence was stable to 45° at 1.00 m and, for 16 pt, at all distances, but fell for smaller fonts at longer distances and, in most conditions, at 60°. Cloud Vision read 80.8% of serial numbers exactly (character error rate 1.9%), against 37.5% for Tesseract. A calibrated 88.5% confidence criterion defined an operating envelope of 16 pt to 1.50 m and 14 pt to 1.25 m at angles up to 45°. Database validation produced no false accepts. Conclusions: Font size, distance, and viewing angle bound reliable label verification; the envelope guides label printing and camera placement, pending confirmation with repositioned replicates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morsalin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: