Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Proactive auto-scaling needs workload forecasts that are accurate, quantify their uncertainty and can be audited, yet most cloud workload predictors report point accuracy only. Methods: We propose XE-CLA, a hybrid convolutional, long short-term memory and temporal-attention network with joint point and quantile (τ = 0.8, 0.9, 0.95) outputs. Using 11,746 real PlanetLab virtual machine (VM) days of CPU traces with chronologically separated test days, we compared XE-CLA with 12 statistical, machine-learning, deep and ablated models over three seeds, explained it with Expected Gradients under a deletion-based faithfulness test, and evaluated its decisions in a SPECpower-calibrated auto-scaling simulator. Results: XE-CLA achieved the lowest mean absolute error at all horizons (5 min: 5.15 percentage points), 20.6% below persistence and 6.4% below ARIMA, although differences among learned models were below 2% and random forest had the lowest RMSE. Quantile coverage was 0.787, 0.889 and 0.938. Allocation at the 0.9 quantile used 5.7–10.5% less energy than point-forecast-plus-headroom policies at equal unmet demand (8.01%) and 77.5% less than static provisioning. Time of day accounted for 61.7% of attributions to the provisioning headroom versus 31.5% for the point forecast, whereas attention weights were near-uniform. Conclusion: For noisy VM-level workloads, converting forecasts into allocations through calibrated quantiles matters more than marginal gains in point accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mossammat Ruksana Rashid (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: