Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ball Divergence (BD) is a robust, ball-based measure of distributional dissimilarity, but it is not a metric and therefore lacks a coherent geometric scale for distance maps, clustering, and multidimensional scaling. We introduce the Unified Ball Distance (UBD), which retains BD's equality-zero property while endowing probability measures with metric geometry. UBD anchors ball comparisons to a shared reference design, and we prove that its square root satisfies the metric axioms. The sample UBD yields a simple nonparametric two-sample test with a distance scale comparable across pairs. We establish almost-sure consistency, finite-sample concentration inequalities, and the null asymptotic distribution. Simulations show competitive and often higher power under heavy tails and scale changes. A three-arm antidepressant study shows that the UBD distance matrix matches the clinical efficacy ordering, enabling geometry-driven workflows such as clustering and multidimensional scaling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiang Zhang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: