Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Disability stigma can restrict participation and access to opportunities, yet culturally specific measures of public disability stigma remain limited in Peru. Objective: To develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a Spanish-language scale assessing public stigma toward persons with disabilities among adults in Juliaca, Peru. Method: A cross-sectional instrumental study was conducted with a non-probability convenience sample of 1,065 adults from Juliaca, Peru. Six experts assessed content validity using Aiken’s V. The sample was divided into mutually exclusive development (n = 533) and confirmatory (n = 532) subsamples. Exploratory factor analysis used polychoric correlations, MINRES extraction, and Promax rotation; competing confirmatory models were estimated with WLSMV. Internal consistency, average variance extracted (AVE), composite reliability, HTMT, and measurement invariance across sex were examined. Results: Content validity was strong (Aiken’s V = .96–1.00). Parallel analysis favored two factors, whereas the four-factor exploratory solution showed the strongest relative multidimensional fit and explained 62.6% of the variance. In the confirmatory sample, the empirical four-factor model showed the strongest relative fit, χ²(164) = 902.79, CFI = .935, TLI = .924, RMSEA = .092, SRMR = .051. Reliability was acceptable to good; HTMT indicated limited differentiation between two factors (.924). Metric invariance across sex was supported. Conclusions: The scale showed promising preliminary psychometric evidence in adults from Juliaca. Further refinement and independent replication are needed before broader application in disability and rehabilitation research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Callacondo-Quispe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: