Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: Information and communication technology is increasingly used for remote oral health assessment. However, evidence regarding video-based assessment of denture quality remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement between video-based and on-site assessments of denture quality using videos recorded with a mobile device and to examine the inter-rater reliability of video-based assessments among dentists. Methods: Participants were 150 older adults who wore dentures and received routine clinical care at three Showa Medical University hospitals between April 2024 and February 2026. Dentist 1 conducted the on-site assessment and recorded intraoral and extraoral videos using a mobile device. Three dentists independently assessed denture quality from the videos using the modified 5-Defects criteria. Agreement was evaluated using linear weighted Cohen’s kappa, exact agreement, and agreement within ±1 point, with Spearman’s correlation coefficient as a supplementary measure. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient based on a two-way mixed-effects model with absolute agreement. Results: The modified 5-Defects total scores showed good agreement between on-site and video-based assessments for both maxillary and mandibular dentures. Inter-rater reliability among the three video evaluators was also high, with single-measure ICC values of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.77–0.86) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.72–0.83), respectively. Conclusions: Video-based denture quality assessment using standardized videos recorded by a trained dental team showed good agreement with on-site assessment and high inter-rater reliability among dentists. These findings support the potential of this approach for remote denture assessment by dentists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
NAMIKAWA et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: