Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine students' and faculty members' preferences for print and electronic resources and the factors influencing their resource choices in Kenya Medical Training College (KMTC) libraries. Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted among students and faculty in nine selected Kenya Medical Training College (KMTC) campuses. A multistage sampling technique was used to select the study sites, with proportionate sampling employed for students and a census conducted for all available lecturers. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 27. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies and percentages, were used to preferred resource formats, preferred online databases, and the factors influencing resource choice. Findings were presented using tables and figures. Findings: The study concluded that students and faculty at KMTC did not demonstrate an exclusive preference for either print or electronic resources. Instead, resource preference is determined by the nature of the learning task and the perceived advantages of each resource format. While electronic resources are increasingly preferred because of their accessibility, convenience, and flexibility, print resources continue to play an important role in supporting intensive reading and academic learning. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study recommended that KMTC should continue investing in both print and electronic library resources to sustain a balanced hybrid library environment that accommodates diverse user preferences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Musovya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: