Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: Lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs) harboring concurrent mutations in KRAS and STK11 define a clinically aggressive subgroup characterized by primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In contrast, KRAS/TP53 co-mutant tumors typically exhibit an inflamed tumor microenvironment (TME) and improved responsiveness to immunotherapy. The mechanisms underlying immune evasion in KRAS/STK11-mutant LUADs remain incompletely understood. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We assembled a multicenter cohort of human LUAD specimens and performed integrative genomic and immunophenotypic analyses to dissect the TME of KRAS/STK11 (KS) and KRAS/TP53 (KP) co-mutant tumors. RESULTS: We identify neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation as a defining feature of KS tumors, associated with neutrophil enrichment and reduced CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration. Using immunocompetent Kras-mutant murine models, we demonstrate that Stk11 loss promotes NETosis through activation of the complement C5a-C5aR1 axis, resulting in an immunosuppressive TME and resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Pharmacologic inhibition of C5a signaling suppresses NETosis, reduces tumor growth, and restores T-cell infiltration in KS tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings uncover NETosis as a key mechanism of immune escape in KRAS/STK11-mutant LUADs and identify the C5a-C5aR1 pathway as a therapeutically actionable vulnerability to overcome immunotherapy resistance in this patient population. These findings provide a rationale for biomarker-driven clinical strategies targeting the complement pathway in patients with STK11-mutant lung adenocarcinoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrea et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: