Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Periodic-layered structures form in some ternary diffusion couples, but their formation mechanism is still debated. Three mechanisms are proposed: unequal diffusion rates, chemical potential instability, and diffusion-induced stress. In the Ce–Mg–Zn system, periodic layers were reported at 300 °C without a mechanism. This study examines which mechanism the morphology supports. Two diffusion couples paired pure Zn with a binary Ce–Mg alloy. The alloy contained 24.54 at.% Ce in the first couple and 71.76 at.% Ce in the second. Both couples were annealed at 300 °C for 21 days. Phases were assigned from WDS compositions. Repeat distances were measured from grey value line profiles. Mg–Zn-rich and Ce-bearing layers alternated in both couples. The first couple formed Mg2Zn11, MgZn2, Ce2Zn17 and ternary τ phases across seven reaction zones. The second formed Mg2Zn11, MgZn2 and Ce–Zn-rich phases across eight. The coefficient of variation of the repeat distance ranged from 1.6% to 17.6%. In the first couple, spacing increased over the first three periodic zones and then levelled off. No cracks or voids were found at the layer boundaries. The initial Ce/Mg ratio strongly affected the phase sequence. The data could not separate the three mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmad Omar Mostafa (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: