Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose This study aims to build and test a low-cost autonomous wireless charging station for small rotary-wing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) whose Internet of things telemetry layer lets charging be supervised remotely. Design/methodology/approach A commercial inductive module feeds a step-up converter and a 3S protection board and an ESP32 pushes JavaScript Object Notation telemetry at 5 Hz over its own access point to a Flutter ground control station. The link is characterised analytically, then ten charge cycles, a misalignment sweep and ten stability sessions measured. Findings Transmitter-rail-to-battery efficiency was 70.10 ± 0.55 %, the inductive link accounting for 2.8 W of the 3.08 W lost. Charging current held above 90 % of its centred value to 5 mm and reached zero at 15 mm, the collapse beyond that band being converter drop-out rather than lost coupling. Latency was 199.6 ± 2.85 ms at 0.027 % packet loss. Research limitations/implications One airframe, one pad and one client, indoors. Electromagnetic compatibility, avionics interference, outdoor conditions and communication security were not characterised and the fly-land-recharge loop was not closed. Practical implications Four UAVs and three pads give uninterrupted coverage of the missions modelled and retrofitting costs about 30 g of electronics rather than a coil alone. Originality/value Commercial drone-in-a-box products already offer remote supervision; what is new is an openly documented low-cost integration pattern a small team can rebuild, with supervisory performance the literature does not measure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Konar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: