Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Understanding how stochastic gradient noise affects the convergence of Adam is an important problem in stochastic optimization, particularly when the noise exhibits heavy-tailed behavior. In this paper, we investigate the convergence of vanilla Adam in both the expected risk and the empirical risk minimization, focusing on the effects of heavy-tailed noise and its relationship to index sampling. For the expected risk minimization, we establish convergence guarantees under Hölder smoothness and bounded p-th moment assumptions, allowing stochastic gradient noise with infinite variance. Our analysis provides explicit upper bounds on the expected squared gradient norm and shows that the iteration-dependent convergence term decays more slowly as p decreases. For the empirical risk minimization, we establish asymptotic and non-asymptotic convergence guarantees and demonstrate that heavy-tailed population noise can deteriorate convergence bounds through dataset-dependent constants as the dataset size increases. Furthermore, under Lipschitz smoothness, we formulate multistage Adam with practical learning rate schedules and demonstrate that increasing batch sizes can reduce index-sampling noise and improve convergence guarantees and SFO complexity. Numerical experiments support our theoretical findings on the effects of heavy-tailed noise and the computational benefits of increasing batch sizes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oowada et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: