Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Speed ripple attenuation in geared flexible drives requires control of synchronous components and residual fluctuations within an existing embedded control architecture. This paper develops a five-state delay-coordinate predictive damping controller (D5–PD) that adds auxiliary q-axis current to a proportional–integral (PI)-regulated drive. Direction-specific models are identified from drive speed history and auxiliary current records with exact delay shifts. A three-step output-weighted design is solved offline and deployed as five-coefficient feedback with scalar scheduling and current limits, at a 1 ms auxiliary update period on an F28379D. Experiments compare PI, six-branch multi-resonant control (MR), and D5–PD under six conditions with three runs per controller. At +300 r/min and +1 A, D5–PD reduces mean speed ripple root mean square (RMS) by 38.83% relative to PI and 5.61% relative to MR at nearly equal auxiliary command alternating-current (AC) RMS. Its load current-normalized responses at 2 and 8 Hz are 37.39% and 60.17% lower than MR without disturbance-specific retuning. Total ripple is lower than PI in all six conditions and MR in five; residual RMS is lower than MR throughout. A separate 0.20 A benchmark with six records per method gives 2.12% lower total ripple and 7.68% lower command RMS than proportional ripple damping. These results demonstrate an embedded auxiliary damping implementation and characterize its tradeoffs with frequency-selective and proportional feedback in terms of total ripple, residual fluctuations and command demand.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: