Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examined the importance of non-financial factors considered by landlords and their variation across residential classes. The paper addresses one research question: how do non-financial factors influence landlords’ tenant selection decisions across different residential classes in the Greater Kumasi Metropolitan Area (GKMA)? A quantitatively driven mixed-methods design was employed, involving 372 landlords from first-class (n = 115), second-class (n = 144) and third-class (n = 113) residential areas in Kumasi. Quantitative data were analyzed using the Relative Importance Index, the Kruskal–Wallis H test, and Dunn’s post hoc test with Bonferroni correction, while qualitative responses underwent content analysis. Overall, 79.2% of landlords had rejected prospective tenants for non-financial reasons. Criminal record ranked highest among first-class (RII = 0.835) and second-class landlords (RII = 0.810), while age and lifestyle compatibility ranked highest among third-class landlords (RII = 0.814 each). Post-hoc results revealed differences between first- and second-class landlords for household size, tenant history and trustworthiness; first- and third-class landlords for age, politeness and substance use; and second- and third-class landlords for criminal record, religion and cleanliness (adjusted p < 0.05). The findings demonstrate that tenant-selection decisions are socially embedded. These guidelines promote fair, transparent screening across residential environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ballo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: