Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We prove that for every prime p ≡ 5 (mod 16), written p = a² + b² with b even, h(−8p) ≡ h(−4p) + 8·[b ≡ ±6 (mod 16)] (mod 16), where h(−4p) and h(−8p) are the class numbers of Q(√−p) and Q(√−2p). This refines the classical congruence h(−8p) ≡ h(−4p) (mod 8) for p ≡ 1, 5 (mod 16) recorded by Berndt. It settles Conjecture 5.3 (Conjecture coord) of Paper V of the series. That conjecture describes when the first derivative coefficient u₁ of the 2-adic power series of the odd quartic character is divisible by λ² = (1 + i)². The proof: writes 4(h(−8p) − h(−4p)) through the representation numbers of x² + 2y² + 4z² and x² + 2y² + 2z², using Gauss’s three-square theorem; builds from sieved theta series a weight-2 form Φ on Γ₀(1024) ∩ ker χ₈ (Serre–Stark); shows Φ ≡ 0 (mod 256) by Sturm’s theorem and a check below the bound 512; reads off the coefficient of Φ at p. Corollaries: the sum of the Legendre symbols (x/p) over 0 < x < p/8 is ≡ 2·[b ≡ ±6 (mod 16)] (mod 4), the next binary digit after Berndt’s parity of the octant sum; combined with Desnoux’s modulo-64 congruence, c₂R(S/2)h⁺(p) + 17R′(S′/2)h⁺(2p) ≡ 2h(−4p) + 8·[b ≡ ±6 (mod 16)] (mod 16). This links the units and class numbers of Q(√p) and Q(√2p) to b modulo 16. The proof is formalized in Lean 4 with Mathlib (ConjCoord, doi:10.5281/zenodo.23902875). The modularity of Φ with Sturm’s theorem, and Gauss’s theorem, are hypotheses there; the rest is proved, including the check below the Sturm bound as a kernel computation. Version 1.1 proves that the Pell solutions S and S′ in the Desnoux corollary are even, so the halves S/2 and S′/2 are integers. If S were odd, R² ≡ 6 (mod 8); if S′ were odd, R′² ≡ 3 (mod 8). It also cites ConjCoord v1.0.1 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23913183), in which the formal corollary takes the Pell equations as hypotheses and proves this evenness. The results are otherwise unchanged.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joseph S. Farland (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: