Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Arts-based programs are increasingly used to support people living with dementia and their care partners; however, there has been a limited focus on multi-modal, participatory performing arts programs offered in both virtual and in-person formats. We completed an evaluation of the Lincoln Center Moments (LCM) program, a free dyadic arts program grounded in four pillars: Validation/Personhood, Social Engagement, Self-Expression, and Artistic Stimulation. An exploratory mixed-methods program evaluation was conducted with 23 dyads ( N = 46). Quantitative measures included program satisfaction, social engagement, and arts engagement. Post-session interviews were coded using an evaluative framework aligned with program pillars. Program satisfaction was high across both modalities. Care-partner-reported arts engagement for PLWD increased from pre- to post-season among the in-person subgroup but not the virtual subgroup; modality-specific analyses were exploratory. Social engagement scores were similar across formats, although in-person attendees were more likely to report friendships with others. Qualitative data supported all four LCM pillars. LCM was perceived as engaging and supportive by participants in both virtual and in-person settings. Participants who were initially hesitant to engage described greater comfort and willingness to participate over time. Participant feedback suggests that programs like LCM may provide inclusive, accessible spaces for creative engagement – particularly for those unable to attend mainstream performances. Future researchers should explore hybrid delivery formats and assess longer-term dyadic outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walker et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: