Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Removing the multiples of 2, 3 and 5 leaves eight residue classes modulo 30. Pairing every class a with its mirror 30-a turns these eight classes into the eight vertices of the 16-cell, the four-dimensional cross-polytope, and the same construction at every primorial \( M_k=2·3⋯ p_k \) produces a cascade of cross-polytopes \( βφ(M_k)/2 \). On this cascade we study the action of the sign-flip group \( G_k(Z/2)ᵏ⁻¹ \) and establish four structural results: the orbits are exactly the square classes of the unit group; for \( k≥ 6 \) the orbit minima up to \( pₖ₊₁^2 \) are precisely the primes in \( (p_k,pₖ₊₁^2) \) together with \( pₖ₊₁^2 \), and this threshold is sharp; the cascade is recursive, with \( pₖ₊₁ \) the smallest non-trivial orbit minimum; and the number of orbits grows by the exact factor \( (pₖ₊₁-1)/2 \) per level. We then apply one common scheme to twin primes, Polignac, Goldbach, Sophie Germain primes, Hardy--Littlewood constellations, primes of the form \( n^2+1 \), arithmetic progressions, exponential families and the Collatz iteration. For each problem the geometry gives an exact Chinese-remainder count of admissible configurations, a truncated singular series that converges to the classical Hardy--Littlewood constant, a conditional statement, the strongest known unconditional result, and numerical checks up to \( 10^8 \). The construction determines all local factors; whether every admissible configuration is actually occupied by primes (the lifting problem) is not decided by it and remains open wherever it is open classically.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas Krause (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: