Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nonlinear inertia in vibrating systems redistributes incoming kinetic energy among multiple frequency components. This paper examines two coupled aspects: the frequency-domain transformation of nonlinear inertial kinetic energy and its influence on the response and harmonic kinetic-energy distribution of the system output. Two metrics—Energy Transformation Ratio ( R E . T . ) and Energy Distribution ( Dist e )—are proposed to quantify this spectral redistribution. For a general nonlinear inertia coupled to a single-degree-of-freedom isolator, the energy distribution is nearly independent of excitation frequency at high frequencies but strongly frequency-dependent in the low-to mid-frequency range. Higher excitation amplitudes increase the proportion of higher-frequency energy, while a smaller minimum value of the prescribed nonlinear inertia further amplifies this effect. The type of coupled isolator also reshapes the energy spectrum: the X-structure results in a lower high-frequency energy proportion than linear or nonlinear spring–damper isolators. Nonlinear inertia can significantly enhance the high-frequency components in the system output, and its effects vary across different coupled systems. For even-power nonlinear inertia, the relative energy proportions are shown by mathematical induction to follow a squared Catalan-triangle law under first-harmonic approximation, independent of the coupled system. Experimental results confirm the predicted inertia forms, energy spectra, frequency and amplitude effects, and partial squared Catalan-triangle characteristics. Overall, this study provides an in-depth understanding of the energy distribution patterns and nonlinear phenomena induced by nonlinear inertia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: