Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose This study examines the cyclicality of the corporate investment–financing maturity mismatch in Vietnam. Design/methodology/approach Using panel data from 548 non-financial listed firms in Vietnam over the period 2008 to 2024, the study estimates fixed-effects and dynamic generalized method of moments (GMM) models to address persistence and endogeneity concerns. The findings are further validated through a broad set of robustness tests. Findings The results provide strong evidence that maturity mismatch is procyclical. Economic expansions shorten firms' debt maturity and raise their risk-taking behavior, both of which intensify the mismatch. The procyclical pattern is less pronounced for larger firms, Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange (HOSE)-listed firms and high-growth firms. Firms in high-tech sectors and those operating under monetary easing conditions also show weaker procyclical responses. Originality/value This study extends the corporate maturity mismatch literature by highlighting the role of business cycles as a systematic macroeconomic determinant of firms' maturity structure decisions, particularly in emerging markets. It further provides evidence on how economic cycles influence maturity mismatch through debt maturity and risk-taking and highlights heterogeneous firm responses across firm characteristics, industries and monetary policy environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Japan Huynh (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: