Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Urban street views shape everyday urban experience, yet their assessment still relies largely on researcher-defined indicators and structured elicitation, with limited use of naturally occurring public responses. This study develops an interpretable framework that transforms social-media image–comment interactions into eight-dimensional collective emotional appraisals of urban scenes. Under approved access, 1078 Facebook and Instagram cityscape posts and 20,546 comments were retrieved through the SOMAR Virtual Data Enclave. Comment-derived Plutchik labels were assessed through human validation and robustness tests, then used as weak supervision for R-ECoT, which jointly predicts emotion intensities and generates emotion-specific grounding maps from images. The trained CLIP-based model was applied to 610,017 ZENRIN street-view images in Setagaya Ward, Tokyo, and predictions were aggregated to 10 m road segments. Comment-derived labels agreed more closely with an independent post-level human reference than the strongest image-only estimate (Pearson 0.818 versus 0.751). CLIP-R-ECoT achieved the best performance in hierarchical benchmarks, with a KL divergence of 0.329, an MSE of 0.0106, and a balanced accuracy of 0.757. Its grounding maps showed greater random-corrected masking faithfulness than Grad-CAM (0.083 versus 0.049), higher perturbation stability, and lower spatial fragmentation. Street-level mapping revealed differentiated emotional patterns, while emotion-specific high-response regions in the images were associated with distinct semantic, color-atmospheric, and depth-structural attributes. By converting dispersed public reactions into spatially continuous and interpretable evidence, the framework supports fine-grained streetscape screening, helps identify locations warranting closer inspection, and directs design attention toward the visible conditions associated with different public responses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: