Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background and objectives Although the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score has been confirmed to be associated with short-term mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with sepsis, evidence on long-term post-ICU mortality remains limited. This study assessed its prognostic performance for long-term all-cause mortality in elderly survivors of pneumonia-induced sepsis and compared it with several immunoinflammatory nutritional indices. Methods From the initial pool of 620 candidates, we screened 510 first-episode sepsis survivors with no sepsis recurrence more than 3 months after ICU discharge. We subsequently established a multicenter ambispective longitudinal cohort of 461 eligible participants for prospective follow-up, with a median follow-up period of 36 months. Using a complete-case approach with ICU discharge as time zero, we assessed the association between CONUT and mortality across the CONUT score tertiles: T1 (score 0–3, n = 162), T2 (4–6, n = 172), and T3 (7–12, n = 127). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to address selection, immortal-time, and landmark biases. Results Long-term risk of all-cause mortality increased stepwise across CONUT tertiles (24.07% vs. 37.21% vs. 58.27%; p < 0.0001). Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated significantly lower survival in patients with higher CONUT scores (log-rank, p < 0.0001). Multivariable Cox regression (Model III) revealed that one tertile increase in CONUT was associated with a 23.3% higher mortality risk (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.233, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.004–1.515; p for trend = 0.036), while the highest CONUT tertile carried a 51.6% increased mortality risk (HR = 1.516, 95% CI = 1.001–2.296; p = 0.039). Stratified analyses detected gender-related effect heterogeneity ( p for interaction = 0.034). Restricted cubic spline (RCS) modeling confirmed a significant positive dose–response association between CONUT and mortality ( p for overall < 0.001, p for nonlinear = 0.575). Multivariable linear regression evidenced that each one-tertile CONUT increase produced measurable changes in immunoinflammatory nutrition-derived indices (calculated as Model III | β | × tertile interval (3.0), with positive β values indicating increases and negative β values indicating reductions): blood urea nitrogen-to-albumin ratio (BAR) increase of 0.2889 ( β = 0.0963), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) increase of 0.5313 ( β = 0.1771), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) increase of 0.2721 ( β = 0.0907), and lymphocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio (LHR) reduction of 0.126 ( β = −0.0420) (all p < 0.01). Time-dependent AUC analysis showed that CONUT prognostic discrimination was comparable to BAR and superior to NLR, PLR, and LHR over a median 36-month follow-up (DeLong test, all p for ΔAUC < 0.05). Decision curve analysis (DCA) illustrated that the CONUT model provided greater overall net benefit than the other markers. Time-dependent integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), time-dependent continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI), a mutually adjusted Cox model, a bidirectional incremental C-index, and calibration curve analyses indicated that CONUT was a core prognostic marker. BAR further improved prognostic performance when added to the CONUT-based model, whereas NLR, PLR, and LHR added little incremental predictive value. Conclusion The bedside CONUT score measured at ICU discharge may be associated with long-term all-cause mortality risk in older sepsis survivors. Further research is required before these findings can inform nutritional interventions in routine clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: