Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Fixed brain retractors risk focal ischemia and cortical injury. Although retractorless dynamic retraction is established in skull base surgery, its role in epilepsy surgery remains poorly characterized. Objective: To evaluate long-term seizure outcomes, safety, and reliability of retractorless standard anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) in drug-resistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE), and identify predictors of seizure freedom. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 42 patients who underwent retractorless standard ATL for drug-resistant MTLE. Dynamic retraction used bipolar forceps and pressure-controlled suction. The primary outcome was seizure freedom (Engel Class Ia) at minimum 24-month follow-up; secondary outcomes were complications and resection adequacy on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Predictors were identified using multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: At a mean follow-up of 66.3 months, 69% of patients achieved complete seizure freedom (Engel Class Ia), and 83.3% achieved freedom from disabling seizures (Engel Class I). Postoperative MRI confirmed adequate resection in 95.2% of cases. Complications were uncommon and unrelated to retraction injury. Low preoperative seizure frequency (< 3 seizures/week) was the sole independent predictor of seizure freedom (odds ratio, 24.21; P = 0.026), while higher frequency (≥ 3 seizures/week) was associated with increased recurrence risk (hazard ratio, 7.34; P = 0.042). Conclusion: Retractorless standard ATL is safe and effective for drug-resistant MTLE, achieving long-term seizure control while minimizing retraction-associated risks. Preoperative seizure burden was the dominant prognostic marker, supporting early surgical intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaisawasthomrong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: