Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We report the nickel nanostructures electrodeposited with different morphologies to cover the nickel foam and copper oxide nanowire modified substrates. Our approach using different pulse-electrodeposition showed successful bottom-up growth of nanostructured materials ranging from dense rhombic pyramids to interlaced three-dimensional (3D) nanorod networks. The results revealed that the electrode comprised of electrodeposited nanocrystalline Ni films/CuO nanowires/copper foam featuring a 3D morphology provided a higher electrochemically active surface area, rapid redox kinetics, and highly reduced charge-transfer resistance (2.817 Ω). The quasi-solid-state Ni–Zn battery assembly using the 3D Ni electrode exhibited a significant performance over different charge and discharge current rates with particularly achieved maximum capacity of 110.9 mAh·g −1 at 5 mA cm −2 . This represents an enhancement of more than tenfold compared with Ni–Zn electrodes based on nanocrystalline nickel films. Transport of ions and electrons and multi-electron Ni redox with the O–O* intermediates with a defect-rich nanostructure from the pulsed reverse current (PRC) was the main reason for the improvement of performance. We are sure that the present work features a 3D design for high-kinetic Ni–Zn batteries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shajirati et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: