Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Perpetual-futures funding is a deterministic transformation of a kernel-weighted premium integral, yet the integral is rarely used as the state variable in next-settlement forecasts. We derive exact discrete moments and clamped-normal predictive distributions under an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck premium model, then evaluate genuinely out-of-sample forecasts for BTC, ETH, and SOL on Binance, Gate, and Hyperliquid. The 38-day public-data sample contains 2,781 targets over 31 evaluation days. OU reduces pooled RMSE from 0.2368 bp for the last-settlement benchmark to 0.1968 bp, but remains slightly behind EWMA at 0.1947 bp. Improvements over Last are strongest on Hyperliquid; Binance and Gate favor EWMA over OU. Minute-level reconstruction supports linear rather than equal kernels on Binance and Gate. Twenty configurations and Holm/Reality-Check procedures address selection. Gaussian intervals fail by venue: 95% coverage is 39.1%, 43.5%, and 97.7%, respectively. The evidence supports mechanism-aware point forecasting, not uniformly superior accuracy, calibrated uncertainty, or executable net returns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hang Liu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: