Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Immediate implant placement is associated with remodeling of the peri-implant hard and soft tissues. Buccal gap grafting has been proposed to reduce dimensional changes; however, its long-term clinical benefits remain uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the 30-month clinical, radiographic, and esthetic outcomes of buccal gap grafting following flapless immediate implant placement. This study represents the 30-month follow-up of a previously conducted randomized controlled clinical trial. Nineteen patients receiving 24 implants were allocated to flapless immediate implant placement with buccal gap grafting using a xenogeneic bone substitute (test group) or without grafting (control group). The primary outcome was peri-implant marginal bone level change at 30 months. Secondary outcomes included peri-implant clinical parameters, early buccal bone dimensional changes assessed by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) at 4 months, and esthetic outcomes evaluated using the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) and White Esthetic Score (WES). Implant-level outcomes were analyzed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) to account for clustering of implants within patients. Implant survival was 100% at the 30-month follow-up. Total marginal bone level loss was 0.08 ± 0.53 mm in the test group and 0.53 ± 0.50 mm in the control group, with an estimated between-group difference of 0.45 mm (95% CI, 0.06–0.84; P = 0.025). No significant between-group differences were observed in peri-implant clinical parameters, early buccal bone dimensional changes, or esthetic outcomes assessed using the PES and WES. Within the limitations of this exploratory long-term follow-up study, buccal gap grafting was associated with reduced peri-implant marginal bone loss after flapless immediate implant placement. However, the clinical relevance of this difference remains uncertain, and no significant benefits were observed for peri-implant soft tissue health or esthetic outcomes. Larger randomized clinical trials with appropriate statistical methods and long-term three-dimensional radiographic assessment are needed to confirm these findings. Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT), IRCT201606188898N3. Registered on 9 September 2016. This study represents a long-term follow-up of a previously conducted randomized controlled clinical trial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akbari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: