Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Universities require sexual violence prevention strategies that integrate gender awareness, recognition of abusive conduct, perceptions of safety, and knowledge of institutional reporting channels. Objective: This study describes these four dimensions in a student survey and identifies the most salient informational gaps. Methods: A secondary descriptive analysis was conducted on 200 individual responses captured in a university survey workbook. Twenty yes/no items were organized into four predefined five-item domains. Item-level affirmative proportions and equal-item domain averages were calculated, recoding eight unanswered items as “No” in fixed-denominator descriptive summaries. Results: Mean affirmative response proportions were 86.4% for gender awareness, 96.6% for sexual violence literacy, 90.2% for perceived safety and engagement, and 87.3% for reporting-related knowledge and intentions. Although 97.0% endorsed willingness to report or assist reporting, only 72.5% identified awareness of the relevant campus task force or designated support unit. A further 78.0% recognized potentially harmful gender stereotypes. Conclusion: Responses indicate high declared awareness but uneven knowledge of institutional help pathways. These cross-sectional self-reports neither establish prevention effectiveness nor demonstrate actual reporting behavior. Targeted communication of reporting contacts, practical guidance, and follow-up behavioral evaluation are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Intan Tiara Kartika (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: