Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective To assess the cost-effectiveness of cadonilimab plus XELOX versus placebo plus oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) as first-line therapy for HER2-negative advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Methods A partitioned survival model with three states (progression-free survival [PFS], progressed disease [PD], death) was developed over a 10-year horizon (21-day cycles, 5% discount rate). Outcomes included costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated, with sensitivity analyses (one-way, probabilistic [PSA]) to evaluate robustness. Results The base-case analysis demonstrated that adding cadonilimab to chemotherapy improved outcomes by 0.25 QALYs but increased costs by ¥217,521, leading to an ICER of ¥870,084 per QALY—surpassing the acceptable WTP threshold (3× China’s 2024 GDP per capita). One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the model was most sensitive to changes in PD/PFS health utilities, drug cost, and body weight. Notably, probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested 0% probability of this strategy being cost-effective. Conclusion At the current WTP threshold, cadonilimab with chemotherapy is not cost-effective for HER2-negative advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Clinical trial number Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: