Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A condition-dependent recoverable stability boundary is proposed for risk-supervised direct yaw-moment control of distributed-drive electric vehicles. Recoverable states are identified through long-horizon nonlinear trajectories converging to a stable equilibrium without yaw-moment intervention. Stable-manifold information is used only when consistent with numerical classification. Conservative convex inner approximations with common half-space normals enable boundary updates through database lookup and bilinear interpolation. A boundary-utilization index continuously regulates yaw-moment participation within model predictive control. Compared with a geometric phase-plane boundary, enclosed areas increase by 53.3% and 145.2% at 110 and 80 km/h with adhesion coefficients of 0.60 and 0.50, respectively. At 110 and 70 km/h with adhesion coefficients of 0.80 and 0.50, the increases are 58.0% and 158.2%. No overestimation is observed on the evaluation grid. In the first two conditions, peak sideslip-angle errors decrease by 36.4% and 45.2% relative to permissive fixed-boundary control, while peak additional yaw moments are 72.7% and 63.2% lower than with conservative fixed-boundary control. At 80 km/h with adhesion coefficient of 0.35, peak sideslip-angle error decreases by 55.8% relative to no yaw-moment control. Ten co-simulations yield an aggregate equivalent mean simulation execution time of 1.54 ms per 10 ms control interval.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: