Key result
Dipole density mapping identifies a ~76% smaller depolarized area during AF than voltage mapping.
Why the study?
Initial findings were needed to evaluate a novel non-contact system that uses ultrasound and dipole density to globally image anatomy and continuously map AF during ablation procedures.
Observational (n=7)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Feasibility of AcQMap non-contact mapping shown in initial cohort; leaves open whether it improves AF ablation outcomes versus standard systems.
Introduction: Electro-anatomic mapping is standard practice in AF ablation procedures.Virtual anatomies are created to locate structures and navigate catheters and voltage (V) is used to map arrhythmias.We report on the initial findings with a new system using Ultrasound (U/S) and Dipole Density (DD) to globally image the anatomy and continuously map AF.Methods: A novel non-contact imaging and mapping system (AcQMap), consisting of a basket catheter (48 U/S transducers, 48 electrodes) and console, simultaneously acquires 100,000þ U/S points/ min to reconstruct the chamber anatomy and 150,000 intracardiac unipolar voltage (V) samples per second to map cardiac activity.The 3D surface is algorithmically reconstructed from the U/S point-set with mesh-density comparable to a segmented CT (sCT).Inverse and Forward algorithms are applied on intracardiac V to derive and display electrical activation as Dipole Density and unipolar Voltage maps, respectively, upon the ultrasound-constructed 3D anatomy (Figure).Global data is acquired simultaneously and derived continuously from single-beats or single-cycles (for AF) in real-time.Maps are displayed as a dynamic animation using the standard "thermal" colour-scale, with the colour-band set to a narrow width and positioned slightly below the baseline, at 2% of the peak-negative value (see map colour-legend).This colour setting depicts the negative phase of Dipole Density and Voltage as a red region that, when animated, is associated with propagation of depolarization.Patients undergoing ablation of AF were consented for U/S and DD mapping.U/S Left atrial anatomy was compared from full and sub-sampled point-sets and compared to pre-procedure sCT.DD and V maps were derived for each patient and depolarized surface areas were compared.Results: Seven patients (57% Male, mean age 61.4 + 10.3 yrs, AF duration 4.2 + 2.3 yrs) were enrolled.Complete data sets were collected in 6 subjects.LA surface acquisition times were 8.48 + 5.0 min.Surface acquisition must be performed for at least 30 seconds to achieve a consistent median distance between AcQMap and sCT surfaces.In the latter 4 subjects comprising initial experience in the second laboratory, consecutive acquisition times decreased from 6:39 to 4:07 minutes.The absolute median distance between surfaces was 2.71 mm.During AF, the mean depolarized area for DD maps was 26.9 cm 2 , significantly less than for V maps (110.6 cm 2 , p , 0.001).Overall V:DD ratio was 4.11 for AF.Conclusions: Real-time U/S based LA reconstruction was rapid and compared favourably to sCT.DD map provides 4.11 times higher resolution than V maps.The combination of CT-quality anatomy and DD mapping opens the possibility to map AF with more precision to identify areas of interest as potential ablation targets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heck et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=7). AcQMap ultrasound and dipole density (DD) mapping system vs. Pre-procedure segmented CT (sCT) and unipolar voltage (V) mapping was evaluated on Mean depolarized surface area during atrial fibrillation (cm2) (p=<0.001). Dipole density mapping during AF yielded a significantly smaller mean depolarized area than voltage mapping (26.9 vs 110.6 cm2, p<0.001) and closely matched CT anatomy (median distance 2.71 mm).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: