Key result
Secondary mental health services record zero suicides despite high-risk factors, highlighting targeted prevention challenges.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Standard risk criteria should not yet change post-discharge psychiatric resource allocation; leaves open how to accurately identify patients needing intensive suicide-prevention follow-up.
the month after discharge the risk of suicide is increased over 100-fold.Approximately 2/8% of those presenting after parasuicide will have com- mitted suicide at eight year follow up.For those admitted to hospital the risk might be expected to be higher: 15% of patients admitted to hospital with depression commit suicide.3The introduction of more complex discharge procedures and the care programme approach have led to a greater concentration on patients who require admission to hospital and suffer severe mental illness.The lack of new resources to implement these time consuming procedures may lead to reduced provision for patients presenting in crisis.The lack of suicides in our cohort, despite important risk factors, illustrates the difficulties for secondary services in effectively targeting those at high risk of suicide.The Health of the Nation aims at reducing the rate of suicide by 15% overall and by 33% among people with serious mental illness.4In the absence of meaningful target groups, with limited and redirected resources we run the risk of targeting too specific a group, by default, and failing to meet those aims.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taylor et al. (1994) conducted a letter in Suicide risk after psychiatric hospital discharge or parasuicide. Hospital discharge / parasuicide presentation was evaluated on Suicide. Secondary mental health services recorded 0 suicides in this cohort despite high-risk factors, highlighting difficulties in targeting groups to reduce suicide rates by 15% overall.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: