Why the study?
DNA methylation signatures capture cumulative lifestyle exposures and biological aging, motivating evaluation of whether DNAm-based scores and epigenetic aging clocks are associated with clinical outcomes and mortality in patients with HF.
Do blood-based DNA methylation scores and epigenetic aging clocks predict mortality and heart failure hospitalization beyond established clinical risk factors and NT-proBNP in patients with heart failure?
Cohort (n=2,594)
Yes
Do blood-based DNA methylation scores and epigenetic aging clocks predict mortality and heart failure hospitalization beyond established clinical risk factors and NT-proBNP in patients with heart failure?
Blood-based DNA methylation scores and epigenetic aging clocks independently predict mortality and clinical outcomes in heart failure beyond the MAGGIC score and NT-proBNP, particularly among patients classified as having lower clinical risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports epigenetic prognostication in HF; leaves open whether scores add value beyond standard models.
Background DNA methylation (DNAm) signatures capture cumulative lifestyle exposures and biological aging. This prospective study evaluated whether DNAm-based scores and epigenetic aging clocks are associated with clinical outcomes and mortality in a multinational cohort of patients with heart failure (HF). Methods We studied 2,594 patients with HF from 40 countries in the Global Congestive Heart Failure (G-CHF) registry with whole-blood DNAm data. Fifteen published DNAm-based scores and epigenetic aging clocks reflecting lifestyle, environmental and physiological exposures, inflammation, frailty, mortality risk, and biological aging were derived. Associations with HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death were assessed using multivariable Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, ancestry, the MAGGIC risk score, and NT-proBNP. Incremental prognostic value was compared to MAGGIC score and NT-proBNP. Extreme DNAm profiles were defined as scores or clocks exceeding ±1.5 standard deviations (s.d.) from the population mean. Results Mean age was 62.7±14.0 years, 66.2% were male, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 40.1±14.1%. During a median follow-up of 3.0 years, 338 patients were hospitalized for HF, 349 died from cardiovascular causes, and 565 died from any cause. Higher epigenetic age and DNAm scores for CRP, frailty, and mortality were associated with increased risk, whereas higher diet-related DNAm scores were inversely associated. For all-cause death, adjusted hazard ratios per 1-s.d. were 1.36 (95% CI, 1.24-1.50) for GrimAge, 1.27 (95% CI, 1.17-1.38) for the DNAm score for CRP, 1.44 (95% CI, 1.28-1.63) for the DNAm score for frailty, and 1.48 (95% CI, 1.32-1.65) for the DNAm score for mortality, compared with 0.81 (95% CI, 0.75-0.88) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.94) for the DNAm scores for Alternative Healthy Eating Index and Mediterranean Diet Score. These patterns were directionally consistent for cardiovascular death and weaker for HF hospitalization and were more pronounced among patients with lower clinical risk (MAGGIC<17, P interaction <0.05), particularly for all-cause death. Patients with 4-5 extreme-high DNAm scores or clocks had more than twice the risk of death (HR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.65-3.13). Conclusions DNAm-based scores and epigenetic aging clocks reflect multiple dimensions of biological vulnerability in HF and are associated with clinical outcomes and mortality beyond clinical risk factors. Clinical Perspective What is new? In 2,594 patients with heart failure (HF) from 40 countries, blood-based DNA methylation (DNAm) scores for inflammation, frailty, and mortality, as well as epigenetic aging measures, were associated with mortality and other clinical outcomes after adjustment for established risk factors and NT-proBNP. These associations were stronger among patients with lower clinical risk, suggesting that epigenetic signatures may capture biological vulnerability not fully reflected by conventional risk assessment. A greater accumulation of adverse epigenetic signatures was associated with progressively higher mortality risk; each additional extreme-high DNAm score or aging clock was associated with an 18% higher risk of death. What are the clinical implications? DNA methylation may complement conventional clinical risk assessment by identifying biological vulnerability beyond established clinical risk factors. Multidimensional epigenetic profiling may provide a framework for molecular phenotyping of HF and for identifying patients with residual biological risk who may warrant further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meyre et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=2,594). DNA methylation-based mortality score (per 1-SD increase) vs. Lower DNA methylation-based mortality score was evaluated on All-cause death (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.32-1.65).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: