Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Class imbalance and competing process requirements complicate defect prediction and process optimization in sand casting. This study develops a framework combining constraint-aware imbalanced learning, model interpretation, and joint process-window identification for QT450-10 ductile iron castings. An industrial dataset comprising 6,385 records, 18 process variables, and five quality classes was analyzed. Borderline-PC SMOTE augmented minority classes exclusively within the training partition while restricting synthetic records to prescribed process bounds. The resulting backpropagation neural network achieved an overall accuracy of 93.58% and an all-class macro-F1 score of 0.8488. Compared with conventional BP, balanced accuracy increased from 83.31% to 87.73%, and macro-F1 across the four defect classes increased from 0.8008 to 0.8196. SHAP analysis identified distinct predictor patterns: pouring temperature and carbon were prominent for cold shut; inoculant dosage, new sand fraction, and aluminum for blowhole; new sand fraction and sand temperature for sand inclusion; and magnesium, pouring temperature, carbon, and silicon for shrinkage. Temperature responses differed between cold shut and shrinkage, supporting joint parameter evaluation. A separate probability-calibrated BP surrogate identified a candidate window across all 18 variables. Within this window, 19,852 of 20,000 Sobol-sampled combinations met both the defect-free classification criterion and a calibrated probability threshold of 0.90, yielding a model-based acceptance rate of 99.26%. The framework improves class-balanced defect recognition and translates model responses into candidate operating intervals for independent production validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: