Key result
Environmental exposures like air pollution and noise are linked to disrupted blood pressure homeostasis and variability.
Why the study?
Evidence linking non-traditional environmental exposures—such as psychosocial factors, noise, light, chemical pollutants, micro- and nanoplastics, and proximal residential environments—to blood pressure is fragmented. Furthermore, studies often conflate mean blood pressure, incident hypertension, and blood pressure variability (BPV) as equivalent outcomes.
This review synthesizes multiscale mechanisms linking diverse macroenvironmental and proximal exposures to distinct blood pressure phenotypes to inform stratified hypertension prevention.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evidence on psychosocial, noise, and plastic exposures remains too fragmented for clinical use; leaves open need for standardized prospective studies.
Hypertension is a major contributor to the global burden of cardiovascular disease. In addition to genetics, age, and lifestyle, environmental exposures can disrupt blood pressure homeostasis. Compared with air pollution and ambient temperature, evidence concerning psychosocial factors, noise, light, chemical pollutants, micro- and nanoplastics, and the individual proximal residential environment is more fragmented, and studies often conflate mean blood pressure, incident hypertension, and blood pressure variability (BPV) as equivalent outcomes. Using a continuum from macroenvironmental context to individual proximal exposure, this review integrates evidence from human studies, animal experiments, and in vitro research to compare associations of air pollution, temperature, greenspace, noise, chemical pollutants, micro- and nanoplastics, light exposure, and psychosocial stress with distinct blood pressure phenotypes. We further summarize shared pathways involving autonomic and neurohumoral regulation, oxidative stress–inflammation–endothelial injury, the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS), circadian rhythms, and metabolic/microbiome mechanisms. Human evidence is relatively substantial for air pollution, temperature, noise, and greenspace, whereas direct evidence linking micro- and nanoplastics and some chemical pollutants to human hypertension and BPV remains limited, with mechanistic understanding derived mainly from experimental models. Multiple exposures, genetic and epigenetic backgrounds, and socioeconomic conditions may jointly modify environmental effects. Clarifying exposure dose, level of evidence, and the relevant BPV time scale will help identify environmentally susceptible populations and provide a conceptual basis for stratified prevention and future intervention studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yao et al. (2026) conducted a review in Hypertension and blood pressure variability. Environmental exposures (air pollution, temperature, greenspace, noise, chemical pollutants, micro- and nanoplastics, light exposure, and psychosocial stress) was evaluated on Mean blood pressure, incident hypertension, and blood pressure variability (BPV). Environmental exposures including air pollution, temperature, noise, and greenspace show substantial human evidence for disrupting blood pressure homeostasis and variability.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: