Key result
Evolocumab reduces LDL-C ~38% more than ezetimibe in statin-intolerant patients.
Why the study?
Statin intolerance is reported in up to 10% to 20% of patients, prompting evaluation of the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous evolocumab compared with oral ezetimibe in hypercholesterolemic patients unable to tolerate effective statin doses.
Does subcutaneous evolocumab reduce LDL-C compared with oral ezetimibe in hypercholesterolemic patients with statin intolerance?
RCT (n=307)
Double-blind
Randomized (2:2:1:1)
Does subcutaneous evolocumab reduce LDL-C compared with oral ezetimibe in hypercholesterolemic patients with statin intolerance?
Subcutaneous evolocumab significantly reduced LDL-C by 37% to 39% more than oral ezetimibe with a lower rate of muscle adverse events in statin-intolerant hypercholesterolemic patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Offers effective LDL-C lowering for statin-intolerant patients; extends randomized evidence for PCSK9 inhibitors in this population.
Objectives This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous evolocumab compared with oral ezetimibe in hypercholesterolemic patients who are unable to tolerate effective statin doses. Background Statin intolerance, which is predominantly due to muscle-related side effects, is reported in up to 10% to 20% of patients. Evolocumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), demonstrated marked reductions in plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in a phase 2 study in statin-intolerant patients. Methods The GAUSS-2 (Goal Achievement after Utilizing an Anti-PCSK9 Antibody in Statin Intolerant Subjects) trial was a 12-week, double-blind study of randomized patients (2:2:1:1) to evolocumab 140 mg every two weeks (Q2W) or evolocumab 420 mg once monthly (QM) both with daily oral placebo or subcutaneous placebo Q2W or QM both with daily oral ezetimibe 10 mg. Co-primary endpoints were percent change from baseline in LDL-C at the mean of weeks 10 and 12, and at week 12. Results Three hundred seven patients (age 62 ± 10 years; LDL-C 193 ± 59 mg/dl) were randomized. Evolocumab reduced LDL-C from baseline by 53% to 56%, corresponding to treatment differences versus ezetimibe of 37% to 39% (p <0.001). Muscle adverse events occurred in 12% of evolocumab-treated patients and 23% of ezetimibe-treated patients. Treatment-emergent adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were comparable across treatment groups. Conclusions Robust efficacy combined with favorable tolerability makes evolocumab a promising therapy for addressing the largely unmet clinical need in high-risk patients with elevated cholesterol who are statin intolerant. (Goal Achievement After Utilizing an Anti-PCSK9 Antibody in Statin Intolerant Subjects-2; NCT01763905).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stroes et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Hypercholesterolemia with statin intolerance (n=307). Subcutaneous evolocumab vs. Daily oral ezetimibe 10 mg with subcutaneous placebo Q2W or QM was evaluated on Percent change from baseline in LDL-C at the mean of weeks 10 and 12, and at week 12 (MD -37% to -39%, p=<0.001). Subcutaneous evolocumab reduced LDL-C by 53% to 56% from baseline in statin-intolerant patients, achieving a 37% to 39% greater reduction than oral ezetimibe (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: