Key result
Prospective AMI cohort across 16 Russian hospitals reports ~3% 6-month mortality.
Why the study?
Cardiovascular mortality in Russia is among the highest in the world, and despite substantial government investment in technology access for AMI, the roles of patient, clinical, and health system characteristics in regional AMI management needed to be understood.
Observational (n=1,107)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective AMI cohort feasible across Russian centers; leaves open outcome predictors, generalizability, and need for validation studies.
BACKGROUND: Death rates from cardiovascular disease in Russia are among the highest in the world. In recent years, the Russian government has invested substantially in the healthcare system, with a particular focus on improving access to advanced technology, especially for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This protocol describes a study to understand the management of AMI in different Russian regions, investigating the role of patient, clinical, and health system characteristics. METHODS: A prospective observational study has recruited a representative sample of AMI patients from 16 hospitals in 13 regions across Russia. Criteria for inclusion are being aged 35-70 years with a confirmed diagnosis of AMI and surviving until the day after admission. Information being collected includes health system contacts and features of clinical management prior to the event and in the 12 months following discharge from hospital. Following initial exploration of the data to generate hypotheses, multilevel modelling will be applied to assess the role of these characteristics in both treatment decisions and any delays in time critical interventions. Between June 2015 and August 2016, 1,122 patients have been recruited at baseline and follow-up to 12 months post-discharge is scheduled to be completed by autumn 2017. The study is unique in examining patient factors, clinical management prior to admission and in hospital in the acute phase and throughout the critical first year of recovery across a diverse range of geographies and facilities. It uses standardized instruments to collect data from patients and health care providers and includes regions that are diverse in terms of geography and development of cardiology capacity. However, given the limited health services research capacity in the Russian Federation, it was not possible to obtain a sample that was truly nationally representative.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Васильевна et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (n=1,107). Patient, clinical, and health system characteristics in AMI management vs. Russian and European guideline-recommended practice was evaluated on Treatment decisions and delays in time-critical interventions across the AMI patient pathway. Across 16 Russian hospitals, 1,107 AMI patients were recruited into this prospective study protocol, with 935 (84.5%) completing 6-month follow-up and 29 dying within 6 months.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: