Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
End-to-end (E2E) autonomous driving systems, which map sensory inputs directly to vehicle planning, have garnered attention for harnessing the potential of data-driven methodologies in motion planning. However, current methods face two limitations that undermine their safety performance in closed-loop driving tasks. First, the predominant imitation learning (IL) paradigm overlooks long-term safety beyond predefined planning horizons, potentially guiding the ego vehicle into hazardous states. Second, the lack of reliable online evaluation mechanisms limits real-time responses to safety risks. To overcome these challenges, we propose SoAD, a safety-oriented E2E framework that integrates long-term safety awareness into planning. SoAD is distinguished by a reinforcement learning (RL)-based value estimation module to quantify the safety of planned trajectories, and a vector world model (VWM) to generate interaction-aware future rollouts. During training, the system benefits from value-guided fine-tuning (VFT) that optimizes the planning distribution to favor safer trajectories. In closed-loop deployment, a planning rescoring (PRS) mechanism is designed to perform reliable online evaluation by combining ego-conditional predictions from the VWM with corresponding safety value estimates. Experimental results on the Bench2Drive closed-loop benchmark demonstrate the state-of-the-art (SoTA) performance of SoAD, achieving a 66.40% improvement in driving score (DS) compared to the vectorized scene representation for efficient autonomous driving (VAD) baseline, while zero-shot evaluation on the driving in occlusion simulation (DOS) benchmark further highlights its strong generalization ability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: