Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction and objective: This study presents findings from a clustered randomised controlled trial evaluating the Support for Students Exposed to Trauma (SSET) intervention among trauma-exposed adolescents in public schools of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. Against a backdrop of political unrest, war-related escalations, disasters, and chronic displacement, children in this region face heightened psychological vulnerability. The 10-week intervention was designed to address core trauma-related difficulties using structured, evidence-informed techniques appropriate for low-resource educational settings. Materials and methods: A total of 131 students aged 10–16 were assigned to intervention and control clusters. To assess the effectiveness of SSET, five outcome domains – post-traumatic stress symptoms, psychological distress, behavioural/emotional problems, perceived social support, and resilience – were measured at pre-, post-, and 3-month follow-up stages. These indicators were selected based on the SSET programme’s theoretical foundations in cognitive-behavioural and trauma-informed approaches, each targeting specific emotional and interpersonal capacities expected to change through intervention. Results: Statistical analysis using mixed-design ANOVA revealed significant improvements across all five indicators in the intervention group. Notably, reductions in post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, emotional/behavioural problems, and psychological distress were accompanied by increased perceptions of social support and resilience. Conclusions: The findings provide strong evidence of the intervention’s effectiveness and demonstrate how schools in under-resourced regions can serve as vital platforms for delivering early psychological interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khurshid et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: