Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
General Relativity (GR) is an effective field theory valid in the infrared regime. Quadratic curvature extensions intended to probe ultraviolet physics generically propagate a massive spin-$2$ ghost and are therefore non-unitary. One route to remove ghost is by enlarging the geometric sector (torsion, non-metricity). We investigate the infrared phenomenology of both the standard (ghostful) and ghost-free fourth-order gravity theories by computing Gravitational Wave (GW) emission and confronting the results with observations such as the orbital-period decay of quasi-stable binaries such as PSR B1913+16 and PSR J1738+0333 and the chirp-mass evolution of GW170817. In the ghostful theory, besides the theoretical inconsistency due to non-unitarity, there are also phenomenological problems: the massless spin-$2$ GW flux cancels the combined GW fluxes of the massive spin-$2$ ghost and massive spin-$0$ scalar in the vanishing-mass limit, so the GR quadrupole formula is not recovered at the leading order. As a result, we obtain the GW constraint on the ghostful theory as m 10⁻¹¹~eV, where m is the mass of the massive modes. By contrast, the ghost-free theory smoothly reproduces the Newtonian potential and GR quadrupole formulae when the two coupling constants α₁ and α₂ vanish, independently of the mass m. Therefore, GW observations put mass-dependent upper bounds on the size of the coupling constants. For example, if we assume α₁α₂ for simplicity, then we obtain α1,2 4.2× 10⁸³ for m~ 3× 10⁻¹⁶\,eV and α1,2 1.3× 10⁷⁵ for m~ 10⁻¹¹\,eV. To our knowledge, these are the first astrophysical-scale bounds reported for ghostful and ghost-free fourth-order gravity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lambiase et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: