Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This work presents a detailed numerical analysis of the rising motion of single bubbles in stagnant liquid metals (LM) over bubble diameters [[EQUATION]]. Simulations were performed using the geometric Volume-of-Fluid (VOF) method implemented in the open-source computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code OpenFOAM. Four bubble–LM systems of nuclear relevance were considered: helium in lead–lithium eutectic (He/LLE), steam in lead–bismuth eutectic (Steam/LBE), nitrogen in LBE (N₂/LBE), and nitrogen in mercury (N₂/Hg). The CFD model was validated against benchmark experimental data for N₂/Hg, yielding a mean absolute relative deviation (MARD) of 4.0%.The simulations revealed distinct trajectory regimes: small bubbles followed oscillatory zigzag paths, whereas larger bubbles rose predominantly vertically. Terminal velocities followed the trend He/LLE (187–206 mm/s) > Steam/LBE (180–185 mm/s) > N₂/LBE (178 mm/s) > N₂/Hg (175–180 mm/s). Notably, velocities for steam bubbles in LBE were up to ~30% lower than reported values from similarity experiments in transparent liquids, suggesting more conservative design margins are required for lead-based reactors. Sixteen published correlations were assessed (terminal-velocity and drag-coefficient models). Most terminal-velocity correlations predicted within 10–20% deviation, with Maneri and Vassallo (2000) performing best (MARD = 8.9%). Drag-coefficient correlations were generally less accurate; Yan et al. (2018) provided the highest predictive capability (MARD = 2.9%). This study provides reference data and a tested methodology for single-bubble dynamics in liquid metals, informing correlation selection and safety analyses in advanced fission and fusion systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rives et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: