Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives This study systematically reviews the literature on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Recruitment & Selection (R&S) and maps the intellectual, conceptual, and social structures of the domain. In particular, three objectives were addressed: (1) to explore trends in publication volume and collaboration patterns in AI-R&S research. (2) Cluster the literature and classify research streams. (3) Identify gaps and suggest future research directions. Design In this mixed-method study, consisting of a bibliometric analysis and qualitative thematic content analysis, data were collected from the Scopus database (2019-2025), and 48 documents (20 articles, 4 reviews, 11 conference papers, 10 book chapters and 3 books) were selected following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guidelines. Results The research field is growing at an average rate of 63.35% per year. Documents have on average 3.19 co-authors, and 25% involve international co-authorship. India is the most productive country (34 affiliation mentions, present in 17 of the 48 documents). The conceptual space is broadly delineated by two streams of work: ethical and technical concerns (algorithmic bias, black box problem), and practical implementation and organizational impact. The field remains fragmented into isolated research clusters, marking it as pre-paradigmatic. Conclusion AI for R&S is still immature and requires practitioners to move from experimentation to ethical and planned use in decision-making. Future research should investigate human-AI collaboration, culture effects, and governance mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Madiha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: