Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigates the influence of network geometry, wettability, and flow conditions on end effects during steady-state immiscible two-phase flow in model pore networks. Systematic co-injection experiments were performed in planar microfluidic networks with periodic and non-periodic geometries and varying wettability characteristics, enabling direct comparison over a broad range of flow conditions, expressed in terms of capillary number and flow-rate ratio. Using the DeProF theoretical framework, pressure-drop measurements were analyzed to evaluate the flow-rate-dependency of relative permeabilities, intrinsic dynamic capillary pressure, and energy efficiency. In parallel, sub-pore-scale imaging provided direct insight into the spatiotemporal evolution of interstitial flow structures under both steady and transient flow conditions. The study: (a) further validates the DeProF framework as a robust and efficient approach for analyzing two-phase flow in porous media, capturing flow-rate dependency and energy efficiency across diverse flow conditions, fluid pairs, and pore-network configurations; and (b) demonstrates its potential to infer interstitial flow-structure characteristics from ex-core (macroscopic) relative permeability measurements. The results show that system-specific correlations can be established between macroscopic flow measurements at critical flow conditions and the underlying interstitial flow structures. These findings support the development of flow-dependent relative permeability scaling models and improved special core analysis (SCAL) protocols that more accurately capture the physics governing two-phase flow in natural porous media.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mouravas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: