Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Decarbonizing electricity generation, heating, and transportation simultaneously requires integrated planning tools that coordinate multiple energy carriers while remaining reliable under uncertainty. This paper develops a carbon-aware and uncertainty-resilient optimization framework for a grid-connected multi-energy hub that co-optimizes electricity, heating, cooling, and transportation services with an explicit hydrogen sub-hub. The model is formulated as a mixed-integer linear program over annual planning states from 2025 to 2050, representing 25 inter-year transition intervals. The hub integrates photovoltaic and wind generation, dispatchable natural gas-based conversion, storage, demand response, EV charging and V2G, and a storage-mediated hydrogen chain comprising an electrolyzer, hydrogen storage, FCEV demand, and stationary fuel-cell reconversion. Two policy archetypes are examined: a carbon tax, represented by an emissions-cost term in the objective, and a net-zero pathway, represented by a declining emissions constraint. Feasibility-critical operational uncertainty is treated through budgeted robust optimization with deviation bounds ± 30 % deviation bounds and a tunable uncertainty budget, applied to electricity and heat balances. Under the adopted representative-period design, the Ontario case yields an electrolyzer expansion from 300 MW in 2025 to 3800 MW in 2050, hydrogen-storage expansion from 2000 to 37,000 MWh, and a robustness premium of approximately 6.6%–9.0% in the policy cases. These numerical magnitudes are conditional on the compression of each planning year into a representative 48-hour window. Because this aggregation excludes sequences longer than that window, the 37-GWh result is not a validated seasonal-adequacy requirement and is likely downward-biased when multi-day low-renewable episodes are binding; the reported robustness premium should likewise be interpreted as conditional on the adopted temporal representation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mirzaee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: