Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Accurate measurement of contraceptive knowledge among medical students remains a critical challenge due to limitations of traditional assessment tools. This study aimed to develop and validate the Clinical Contraceptive Knowledge Test (CCKT) using a modern psychometric framework. Methods A cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted among undergraduate medical students in Vietnam (723 recruited; 636 retained for analysis). The instrument was developed through four sequential phases: (1) Item generation based on Bloom’s taxonomy and WHO Medical Eligibility Criteria (MEC), (2) expert review for content validity, (3) pilot testing using Classical Test Theory, and (4) large-scale validation using Item Response Theory. A two-parameter logistic (2PL) IRT model was applied to evaluate item characteristics, dimensionality, and measurement precision. Results The final instrument, CCKT-18, demonstrated strong psychometric performance. A unidimensional 2PL model was retained based on comparable fit to multidimensional models and high inter-factor correlations (r > 0.80). Model fit indices indicated good fit (CFI = 0.983, TLI = 0.980, RMSEA = 0.036, SRMR = 0.039). The scale showed high measurement precision across a broad range of ability levels, with peak information around the average proficiency level (marginal reliability = 0.844). Item parameters were stable in sensitivity analyses (ΔCFI = 0.003), supporting model robustness. DIF analyses supported measurement invariance across sex, although several items demonstrated DIF across the training stage. Conclusion The CCKT-18 is a valid, reliable, and robust instrument for assessing contraceptive knowledge among medical students. Its IRT-based framework enables precise, competency-oriented evaluation and provides actionable insights for targeted curriculum improvement in reproductive health education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ky et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: