Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is an important biomarker in gastric cancer (GC). Histologic assessment may be limited by tissue sampling and spatial heterogeneity. We evaluated radiomics models for preoperative HER2 classification. Methods: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 7 November 2024 and updated through 10 August 2026. A Study_ID–Report_ID–Cohort_ID index identified overlaps. AUROC (C-statistic) values were pooled on the logit scale using random-effects models. Patient-level diagnostic accuracy was pooled using bivariate random-effects models only for directly reported 2 × 2 tables or unique integer reconstructions. Quality and reporting were assessed using RQS, PROBAST+AI, and TRIPOD+AI. Results: Twenty-three eligible reports represented 20 independent studies and three overlapping companion reports. The modeling population comprised 6,734 patients, including 1,484 with HER2-positive tumors. Pooled AUROC was 0.812 (95% CI, 0.763–0.853; I² = 78.9%) in training cohorts and 0.821 (95% CI, 0.772–0.861; I² = 46.3%) in validation cohorts. For validation CECT models, AUROC was 0.824 (95% CI, 0.772–0.866; I² = 55.5%). In the diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.718 and 0.764 in five training cohorts and 0.714 and 0.827 in four validation cohorts. Conclusions: Radiomics models provided preoperative discrimination of HER2 status. CECT has the largest evidence base and may serve as a research adjunct to histologic testing. PET/CT, DECT, and deep learning require further prospective multicenter validation, with standardized imaging and complete reporting of calibration, decision curves, and clinical utility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: