Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) represents an intermediate stage between normal aging and dementia. Systemic inflammation has been increasingly investigated in relation to age-related cognitive decline. The C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) is a novel inflammatory marker, yet its association with MCI in older adults remains uncertain. This single-center, cross-sectional study included 300 participants aged ≥ 65 years evaluated at the Healthy Aging Center and Neurology Outpatient Clinic. Individuals with acute infection, systemic inflammatory disease, malignancy, immune deficiency, recent trauma, end-stage organ failure, or major psychiatric/neurological disorders were excluded. Cognitive status was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Laboratory parameters included CRP, albumin, glucose, hemoglobin, and complete blood count. CAR was calculated as (CRP/albumin × 100). Group comparisons, Spearman correlations, and univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Of the participants, 204 (68.0%) had MCI. CAR levels were significantly higher in the MCI group (median 34.9 vs. 19.5; p < 0.001), while albumin and glucose levels were lower ( p < 0.05). CAR showed the strongest correlation with MoCA score ( r = − 0.40, p < 0.001). In logistic regression, CAR was independently associated with MCI (OR = 1.035, 95% CI: 1.019–1.053), whereas albumin and glucose demonstrated inverse associations. The explanatory power of the final model was modest (Nagelkerke R² = 0.307). CAR was significantly associated with MCI in older adults, suggesting a potential link between systemic inflammation and cognitive performance. However, due to the cross-sectional design and modest model explanatory power, CAR should not be interpreted as a causal or standalone diagnostic marker. Longitudinal and multicenter studies are needed to evaluate whether inflammatory profiles including CAR are related to cognitive trajectories over time. Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: