Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis is effective for HIV preventing HIV acquisition; however, PrEP initiation and continuation among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) in sub-Saharan Africa remain suboptimal despite ongoing scale-up efforts. This study examined PrEP initiation, 3-month continuation, and associated factors among AYAs aged 15-29 years receiving HIV prevention services in Eastern Uganda from January 2019 to June 2025. Among 10,698 AYAs, 10,132 (94.7%) were assessed for eligibility, 5,190 (51.2%) were eligible, and 2,986 (57.5%) initiated PrEP. Among 2,851 initiators eligible for 3-month assessment, 913 (32.0%) continued PrEP. In multivariate analyses, previous peer outreach contact was strongly associated with both initiation (aOR = 534.63, 95% CI: 276.89-1032.28) and continuation (aOR = 12.41, 95% CI: 9.41-16.35). Facility-based service delivery (aOR = 14.88, 95% CI: 5.05-43.86), psychoactive drug use (aOR = 5.15, 95% CI: 2.97-8.93), and HIV status disclosure (aOR = 4.44, 95% CI: 2.31-8.53) were associated with initiation, while MSM had lower odds of continuation than sex workers (aOR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.45-0.71). Firth sensitivity analysis produced similar continuation estimates. These findings highlight a substantial gap between PrEP initiation and early continuation, and support sustained peer-based, youth-responsive strategies to strengthen PrEP uptake and retention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mwima et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: