Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper examines the lack of psychoanalytic attention to the climate crisis. The focus is on the defensive/adaptive mechanism of dissociation, which, though widespread in larger society, has a particular history in psychoanalysis, which is seen as facilitating the prevailing climate dissociation in our field. Two factors will be examined: 1. Historical, theoretical, and clinical dissociation of painful external realities that hold significance for our field’s engagement with the climate crisis. 2. A narrow understanding of Freud’s views of trauma and psychic reality that has led to a dichotomized view of psychic vs. external reality. It is suggested that psychoanalysts overcome these historical limitations and become climate-aware so that they can hear, name and treat climate anxiety and other climate emotions in their consulting rooms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rita K. Teusch (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: