Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High-grade B-cell lymphomas (HGBCL), which include double/triple-hit lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements and HGBCL, not otherwise specified (NOS), are aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas with a poor prognosis. In high-risk patients, complete response rates after frontline therapy are only 50–60%, and early relapse occurs in 30–40% of cases. Outcomes in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting remain poor, even with modern T-cell–engaging therapies. Bispecific antibodies (BsAb) have emerged as a promising off-the-shelf option, with activity in chemorefractory disease and the ability to induce deep metabolic responses, including in patients who have relapsed after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy or are ineligible for it. However, the aggressive biology of HGBCL raises concerns about the durability of BsAb-induced remissions without consolidation, and therefore about whether patients achieving a complete metabolic response (CMR) should be considered for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Allo-HSCT is a potentially curative strategy for fit patients with R/R lymphoma, mediated by graft-versus-lymphoma (GVL) effects, but it carries a risk of substantial treatment-related morbidity, particularly graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Evidence on allo-HSCT after BsAb exposure is scarce. Available data suggest that this sequential approach is feasible and safe. Here, we report two cases of R/R HGBCL that achieved sustained remission after glofitamab-based therapy followed by consolidative allo-HSCT, with manageable toxicity. These cases add to the emerging real-world evidence for this strategy in fit patients with R/R HGBCL who attain CMR after BsAb therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leone et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: